Search EdWorkingPapers

Search for EdWorkingPapers here by author, title, or keywords.

Nudging at Scale: Experimental Evidence from FAFSA Completion Campaigns

Do nudge interventions that have generated positive impacts at a local level maintain efficacy when scaled state or nationwide? What specific mechanisms explain the positive impacts of promising smaller-scale nudges? We investigate, through two randomized controlled trials, the impact of a national and state-level campaign to encourage students to apply for financial aid for college. The campaigns collectively reached over 800,000 students, with multiple treatment arms to investigate different potential mechanisms. We find no impacts on financial aid receipt or college enrollment overall or for any student subgroups. We find no evidence that different approaches to message framing, delivery, or timing, or access to one-on-one advising affected campaign efficacy. We discuss why nudge strategies that work locally may be hard to scale effectively.

Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/7e99-9477

EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:

Bird, Kelli A. , Benjamin L. Castleman, Jeffrey T. Denning, Joshua Goodman, Cait Lamberton, and Kelly Ochs Rosinger. (). Nudging at Scale: Experimental Evidence from FAFSA Completion Campaigns. (EdWorkingPaper: -117). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/7e99-9477

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX