Search and Filter

Submit a paper

Not yet affiliated? Have a paper you wish to post? Check out the EdWorkingPapers' scope and FAQs, and then submit your manuscript here.

Measuring returns to experience using supervisor ratings of observed performance: The case of classroom teachers

We study the returns to experience in teaching, estimated using supervisor ratings from classroom observations. We describe the assumptions required to interpret changes in observation ratings over time as the causal effect of experience on performance. We compare two difference-in-differences strategies: the two-way fixed effects estimator common in the literature, and an alternative which avoids potential bias arising from effect heterogeneity. Using data from Tennessee and Washington, DC, we show empirical tests relevant to assessing the identifying assumptions and substantive threats—e.g., leniency bias, manipulation, changes in incentives or job assignments—and find our estimates are robust to several threats.

Education level
Topics
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/jmwx-vt04
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Bell, Courtney, and Jessalynn James, Eric S. Taylor, and James H. Wyckoff. (). Measuring returns to experience using supervisor ratings of observed performance: The case of classroom teachers. (EdWorkingPaper: -715). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/jmwx-vt04

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX