Search EdWorkingPapers

Affirmative Action and Its Race-Neutral Alternatives

As affirmative action loses political feasibility, many universities have implemented race-neutral alternatives like top percent policies and holistic review to increase enrollment among disadvantaged students. I study these policies’ application, admission, and enrollment effects using University of California administrative data. UC’s affirmative action and top percent policies increased underrepresented minority (URM) enrollment by over 20 percent and less than 4 percent, respectively. Holistic review increases implementing campuses’ URM enrollment by about 7 percent. Top percent policies and holistic review have negligible effects on lower-income enrollment, while race-based affirmative action modestly increased enrollment among very low-income students. These findings highlight the enrollment gaps between affirmative action and its most common race-neutral alternatives and reveal that available policies do not substantially affect universities’ socioeconomic composition.

Higher Education, Affirmative Action, Access, Admissions
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)

EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:

Bleemer, Zachary. (). Affirmative Action and Its Race-Neutral Alternatives. (EdWorkingPaper: 23-720). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University:

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX