Search and Filter

Submit a paper

Not yet affiliated? Have a paper you wish to post? Check out the EdWorkingPapers' scope and FAQs, and then submit your manuscript here.

Can Light-Touch College-Going Interventions Make a Difference? Evidence From a Statewide Experiment in Michigan

I conduct a statewide experiment in Michigan with nearly 50,000 high-achieving high school seniors. Treated students are mailed a letter encouraging them to consider college and providing them with the web address of a college information website. I find that very high-achieving, low-income students, and very high-achieving, minority students are the most likely to navigate to the website. Small changes to letter content affect take-up. For example, highlighting college affordability induces 18 percent more students to the website than highlighting college choice, and 37 percent more than highlighting how to apply to college. I find a statistically precise zero impact on college enrollment among all students mailed the letter. However, low-income students experience a small increase in the probability that they enroll in college, driven by increases at four-year institutions. An examination of persistence through college, while imprecise, suggests that the students induced into college by the intervention persist at a lower rate than the inframarginal student.

Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/0sjk-be33
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Hyman, Joshua. (). Can Light-Touch College-Going Interventions Make a Difference? Evidence From a Statewide Experiment in Michigan. (EdWorkingPaper: -36). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/0sjk-be33

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX