Search and Filter

Submit a paper

Not yet affiliated? Have a paper you wish to post? Check out the EdWorkingPapers' scope and FAQs, and then submit your manuscript here.

The Formalized Processes Districts Use to Evaluate Mathematics Textbooks

Textbooks are a widely used educational intervention that can affect student achievement, and the marginal cost of choosing a more effective textbook is typically small. However, we know little about how textbooks get from the publisher to the classroom. We use a lens of institutional theory and interviews with district leaders in a stratified random sample of 34 California school districts to investigate the ways mathematics textbook adoption practices vary and predict adoption decisions. We find isomorphic, highly formalized adoption processes in most districts. However, we observe some differences along dimensions of district size, technological interest/infrastructure, and English learner concentration. We recommend states produce and update lists of high quality materials early and often, and that they use a highly rigorous evaluation process. We also recommend states experiment with encouraging similar districts to partner on textbook evaluation and adoption to respond to district demands for information and capacity building around curricula.

Keywords
Curriculum, District Policy
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/2nfr-fd25
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Polikoff, Morgan, Shauna E. Campbell, Cory Koedel, Quynh Tien Le, Tenice Hardaway, and Hovanes Gasparian. (). The Formalized Processes Districts Use to Evaluate Mathematics Textbooks. (EdWorkingPaper: -41). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/2nfr-fd25

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX