Search and Filter

Submit a paper

Not yet affiliated? Have a paper you wish to post? Check out the EdWorkingPapers' scope and FAQs, and then submit your manuscript here.

Framing Effects and the Public’s Attitudes toward Racial Equity in Education Policy

Frames shape public opinion on policy issues, with implications for policy adoption and agenda-setting. What impact do common issue frames for racial equity in education have on voters’ support for racially equitable education policy? Across survey experiments with two independent representative polls of California voters, framing effects were moderated by voters’ prior policy preferences. Among respondents concerned with tax policy, a frame emphasizing the economic benefits of equity elicited higher priority for racial equity in education. Among respondents concerned with social justice, an “equal opportunity” frame elicited higher priority ratings. However, exploratory analyses showed frames only mattered when respondents held mixed policy preferences. Among respondents who (a) valued both tax policy and social justice issues, or who (b) valued neither, both frames were equally impactful.

Keywords
framing effects; racial equity; survey experiment; public opinion; policy preferences; opportunity gap; “achievement gap”
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/g6a0-8m89
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Quinn, David M.. (). Framing Effects and the Public’s Attitudes toward Racial Equity in Education Policy. (EdWorkingPaper: -824). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/g6a0-8m89

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX