Search and Filter

First Impressions Matter: Instructor Gender and Women’s Persistence in Economics

 

Using near-random assignment of students to instructors in introductory economics at a broad-access public university, we study how instructor gender affects women’s persistence in economics. Female instructors close roughly 40 percent of the gender gap in advanced economics course-taking, with a similar but less precisely estimated improvement in major completion. The effect is concentrated in the first introductory course: exposure to a female instructor in the second course adds no detectable persistence benefit once the first instructor’s gender is accounted for. Female instructors also improve women’s relative performance in introductory economics, but grades explain no more than about one-third of the gender-match effect. Class fixed effects and the absence of a detectable male-student response make it difficult to attribute the effect to general instructor quality. The remaining effect is consistent with mechanisms related to belonging, representation, identity, role modeling, or perceived fit. The findings point to introductory-course staffing as a practical tool for shaping women’s persistence in economics.

Keywords
gender, economics education, major choice, role models, human capital
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/5bbj-0v49
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Eckrote-Nordland, Marissa, Lisa Giddings, Laurie Miller, John M. Nunley, and Garrett Soper. (). First Impressions Matter: Instructor Gender and Women’s Persistence in Economics. (EdWorkingPaper: -1498). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/5bbj-0v49

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX