Search EdWorkingPapers

Does Monitoring Change Teacher Pedagogy and Student Outcomes?

Using administrative data from D.C. Public Schools, I use exogenous variation in the presence and intensity of teacher monitoring to show it significantly improves student test scores and reduces suspensions. Uniquely, my setting allows me to separately identify the effect of pre-evaluation monitoring from post-evaluation feedback. Monitoring's effect is strongest among teachers with a large incentive to increase student test scores. As tests approach, unmonitored teachers sacrifice higher-level learning, classroom management, and student engagement, even though these pedagogical tasks are among the most effective. One possible explanation is teachers ``teach to the test'' as a risk mitigation strategy, even if it is less effective on average. This is supported by showing teaching to the test has a smaller effect on student test score variance than other teaching approaches. These results illustrate the importance of monitoring in contexts where teachers have the strongest incentive to deviate from pedagogically sound practices.

Education Policy, Education Quality, Public School Teachers, Labor Contracts
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)

EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:

Phipps, Aaron. (). Does Monitoring Change Teacher Pedagogy and Student Outcomes?. (EdWorkingPaper: 22-510). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University:

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX