Browse by Topics
- Covid-19 Education Research for Recovery
- Early childhood
- K-12 Education
- Post-secondary education
- Access and admissions
- Education outside of school (after school, summer…)
- Educator labor markets
- Educator preparation, professional development, performance and evaluation
- Finance
- Inequality
- Markets (vouchers, choice, for-profits, vendors)
- Methodology, measurement and data
- Multiple outcomes of education
- Parents and communities
- Politics, governance, philanthropy, and organizations
- Program and policy effects
- Race, ethnicity and culture
- Standards, accountability, assessment, and curriculum
- Students with Learning Differences
Breadcrumb
Search EdWorkingPapers
Aaron Phipps
In theory, monitoring can improve employee motivation and effort, particularly in
settings lacking measurable outputs, but research assessing monitoring as a motivator
is limited to laboratory settings. To address this gap, I leverage exogenous variation
in the presence and intensity of teacher monitoring, in the form of unannounced
in-class observations as part of D.C. Public Schools’ IMPACT program. As
monitoring intensifies, teachers use more individualized teaching and emphasize
higher-level learning. When teachers are unmonitored, their students have lower test
scores and increased suspensions. This novel evidence validates monitoring as a
potential tool for enhancing teacher pedagogy and employee performance more
broadly.
Given the simultaneous rise in time-to-graduation and college GPA, it may be that students reduce their course load to improve their performance. Yet, evidence to date only shows increased course loads increase GPA. We provide a mathematical model showing many unobservable factors -- beyond student ability -- can generate a positive relationship between course load and GPA unless researchers control student schedules. West Point regularly implements the ideal experiment by randomly modifying student schedules with additional training courses. Using 19 years of administrative data, we provide the first causal evidence that taking more courses reduces GPA and increases course failure rates, sometimes substantially.