A vast research literature documents racial bias in teachers’ evaluations of students. Theory suggests bias may be larger on grading scales with vague or overly-general criteria versus scales with clearly-specified criteria, raising the possibility that well-designed grading policies may mitigate bias. This study offers relevant evidence through a randomized web-based experiment with 1,549 teachers. On a vague grade-level evaluation scale, teachers rated a student writing sample lower when it was randomly signaled to have a Black author, versus a White author. However, there was no evidence of racial bias when teachers used a rubric with more clearly-defined evaluation criteria. Contrary to expectation, I found no evidence that the magnitude of grading bias depends on teachers’ implicit or explicit racial attitudes.
Experimental Evidence on Teachers' Racial Bias in Student Evaluation: The Role of Grading Scales
Keywords
teacher bias; racial bias; implicit bias; grading rubric; randomized experiment
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/zfnx-k252
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Quinn, David M.. (). Experimental Evidence on Teachers' Racial Bias in Student Evaluation: The Role of Grading Scales. (EdWorkingPaper:
-241). Retrieved from
Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/zfnx-k252Published Edworkingpaper:
(2020). Experimental Evidence on Teachers' Racial Bias in Student Evaluation: The Role of Grading Scaleshttps://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720932188Related Resources from the EdExchange
A library of instruments for education research and school improvement
A new model for informed decision-making in education