Search and Filter

Submit a paper

Not yet affiliated? Have a paper you wish to post? Check out the EdWorkingPapers' scope and FAQs, and then submit your manuscript here.

Student-to-School Counselor Ratios: Understanding the History and Ethics behind Professional Staffing Recommendations and Realities in the United States

This manuscript explores the argument for lower student-to-school counselor ratios in U.S. public education. Drawing upon a comprehensive historical review and existing research, we establish the integral role of school counselors and the notable benefits of reduced student-tocounselor ratios. Our analysis of national data exposes marked disparities across states and districts, with the most underfunded often serving higher percentages of low-income students and students of color. This situation raises significant ethical concerns, prompting a call for conscientious policy reform and targeted investment. Informed by emerging best practices, we propose recommendations for enhancing counselor staffing and ultimately student outcomes. This ethical argument underscores the need for proactive actions and provides a basis for future research to further delineate the impact of school counselor ratios on educational equity and student success.

Keywords
School Counselor Ratios, Educational Equity, Student Success, School Policy
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/pzh5-6t96
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Brown, Carleton H., and David S. Knight. (). Student-to-School Counselor Ratios: Understanding the History and Ethics behind Professional Staffing Recommendations and Realities in the United States. (EdWorkingPaper: -977). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/pzh5-6t96

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX

Published Edworkingpaper:
Brown, C. H., & Knight, D. (2024). Student-to-School Counselor Ratios: Understanding the History and Ethics behind Professional Staffing Recommendations and Realities in the United States. Ethics & Behavior, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2024.2342520