Search and Filter

Submit a paper

Not yet affiliated? Have a paper you wish to post? Check out the EdWorkingPapers' scope and FAQs, and then submit your manuscript here.

Measuring the Affective Language of Principals' Evaluation Feedback and Investigating Differences by Principal Gender and Race

Over the past decade, reforms to principal evaluation systems have sought to incorporate formal feedback structures as a lever for principal improvement. However, we know little about the feedback that principals receive. Using statewide administrative data from Tennessee, including principals’ written feedback from evaluators, we use sentiment analysis to uncover the affective language, or tone, of principals’ feedback, and examine differences in affective language based on principal gender and race. We find that the affective language of refinement feedback (constructive feedback) largely resembles that of reinforcement feedback (affirmative feedback) and that female principals receive reinforcement feedback with less positive affective language relative to observably similar male principals. We also find some suggestive evidence that Black principals receive refinement feedback that is less positive in tone than the feedback to their white peers. We conclude with implications for policy and practice and suggestions for future work.

Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/hb5n-me49
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Gegenheimer, Karin, and Ellen Goldring. (). Measuring the Affective Language of Principals' Evaluation Feedback and Investigating Differences by Principal Gender and Race. (EdWorkingPaper: -1092). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/hb5n-me49

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX