Search and Filter

Answering the call: How changes to the salience of job characteristics affect college students’ decisions

College students often make employment decisions with incomplete information, particularly about compensation. As a result, they may rely on misleading heuristics (such as assuming that interesting or prosocial jobs pay badly) and overlook campus positions that would support both their financial needs and their development. We test whether highlighting job characteristics changes students' application behavior in a preregistered field experiment and find that it does. Increasing the salience of a tutoring job's monetary benefits nearly tripled application rates (a 196% increase). In contrast, messages emphasizing prosocial, career, or social benefits had no effect, despite students reporting these as their primary motivations for applying. The study highlights the incongruencies in college students' decision making alongside a simple, low-cost strategy for recruiting college students to enriching campus jobs.

Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/3gr7-1476
EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:
Robinson, Carly D., Katharine Meyer, Chasity Bailey-Fakhoury, Amirpasha Zandieh, and Susanna Loeb. (). Answering the call: How changes to the salience of job characteristics affect college students’ decisions. (EdWorkingPaper: -956). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/3gr7-1476

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX

Published Edworkingpaper:
Robinson, C. D., Meyer, K., Bailey-Fakhoury, C., Zandieh, A., & Loeb, S. (2026). Answering the call: How changes to the salience of job characteristics affect college students’ decisions. Social Science Research, 137, 103351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2026.103351